Jim Bound writes:
> But A6 will be shipped on the street and its a done deal.
No, it is not. IPNG can terminate the A6/DNAME proposals right now.
Users will continue to rely on AAAA, not on A6 and DNAME.
> we believe it should not be implemented for greater than 3 levels of
> hierarchy
Even a single level of A6 indirection is dangerous. See my example of
AOL committing suicide at the top of http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html.
I can't imagine what you think a 3-level limit would accomplish.
> As one of the people to fund BIND future development
Thank you for disclosing your financial interests. Did you know that
United States antitrust law prohibits packing standards committees?
---Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
