> | Is there any alternate solution to A6 record
> | being looked at ? Something which lies somewhere
> | in between AAAA and A6.
>The obvious thing there would simply be to add some restrictions to the
>use of A6. One currently proposed is to only use A6 0,xxx (which makes
>it isomorphic to AAAA - but at least using the new record format, so
>upgrading to something a bit more complex later would not be impossible).
this part i don't really understand. if we advocate "A6 0 <128bit>"
there will be resolver implementation that does not chase A6 chains
at all (like for cellphones or whatever). if there's no need,
there'll be no code. then, there will be no possibility for "A6
<non-zero> <less-than-128bit> <chain>". so I don't really see benefit
of "A6 0 <128bit>" than "AAAA".
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
