Pekka;
> > > > > Could you please show _exactly_ what part(s) you're referring to?
> > > >
> > > > If I say something is leagal with regard to RFC103[45], I am referring
> > > > to the entire document of RFC103[45].
> > >
> > > Please show the main points why this should be accepted
> >
> > I say it leagal with regard to RFC103[45].
> [snip]
>
> That does not prove anything.
The proof is already given.
There are two ways to understand it.
One is to fully understand all the details of RFC103[45], which
you are incapable of.
The other is to see whether Dan can provide a phrase of RFC103[45]
to deny my example.
As you can see, so far, Dan can not.
> Perhaps you'd be as kind to provide a pointer to the full explanation
> then?
Yes. RFC103[45].
Masataka Ohta
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
