"Perry E. Metzger" wrote: ... > Yes, you need to go on. For the most part, I'm not sure this is going > work out. As I note, we've already deployed. Windows XP and such > aren't going to be obeying any of this, We're designing for 2002 operating systems? I thought we were designing for the next 50 years. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Flow Label Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Flow Label Michael Thomas
- Re: Flow Label Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Flow Label Michael Thomas
- Re: Flow Label Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Flow Label Michael Thomas
- Re: Flow Label Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Flow Label Subrata Goswami
- Re: Flow Label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Flow Label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Flow Label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Flow Label Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Flow Label Keith Moore
- Re: Flow Label Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Flow Label Keith Moore
- Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] James Kempf
- Re: Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] Alex Conta
- Re: Proposed update to RFC 2460 [was Re: Flow Label] Brian E Carpenter