Hi Juha,
What type of last call are you proposing? Do you think that this document should become an informational RFC? Or do you think it should be on the standards track? It was my impression that we (the WG) were hoping to move towards a more general "node requirements" document, using this document as (one of) the input(s). Margaret At 07:28 AM 2/28/02 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > >We "cellular host IPv6" draft authors believe that our draft > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-cellular-host-00.txt > >would be ready for wg last call. > >Bob and Steve, if there are no objections from the WG, >could you please consider announcing last call for this draft? > >Thank You. > >On behalf of all the authors, > Juha Wiljakka >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
