Hi Margaret, > Informational RFC is fine for us (this was discussed in SLC meeting). > > We are happy that our document can be used as an input for a > "general IPv6 node requirements" document that will be > written in the (near) future.
I think we discussed that possibility with the WG chairs, and that seemed to be an acceptable way forward. I think that most of the authors (I for one) would be happy to contribute to the general node requirements. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
