Pekka Savola writes: > In the abstract, s/the stateful protocol/stateful protocols/ ?
Actually the "stateful" wording needs to be changed anyway, as Ralph Droms pointed out in SLC. > In 3.2, Host behaviour of looking up NS record from the reverse of > site-locals may fail for a couple of reasons: e.g. the site could use > multiple domain names, or if the site has no reverses for site-locals, > they might be looked up from somewhere else (as recursion is desired).. Agree, there is no perfect heuristic. The idea is only to suggest a MAY that is better than nothing in many cases. When the lookup fails for whatever reason, you're no worse off than before when you had nothing. Thanks for the comments, -Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
