> > - node with anycast address(*) participating routing exchange > > pros: deployable now, routing protocol has mechanisms for > > protecting against malicious route > injection (sometimes > > they are just "use IPsec"...) > > cons: some hates it when the node is a host > > And how does a host, on the same link with the anycast-capable node, > know to find that node locally? Do we have to accept triangular > routing from host to router to anycast-capable node?
=> router redirects? Am I missing your point? Hesham > > Brian > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
