[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> - node with anycast address(*) participating routing exchange > >> pros: deployable now, routing protocol has mechanisms for > >> protecting against malicious route injection (sometimes > >> they are just "use IPsec"...) > >> cons: some hates it when the node is a host > >And how does a host, on the same link with the anycast-capable node, > >know to find that node locally? Do we have to accept triangular > >routing from host to router to anycast-capable node? > > if the /64 prefix for the anycast address is the same as one used on > the subnet, normal ND works just fine. otherwise, icmp6 redirect will > take care of it. so there's no issue.
Ugh, my brain was locked. Too early to be posting. :) Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
