> > => Exactly, IMHO the support for HAO is tied to > > RO support which is a SHOULD anyway, so the HAO > > should follow that. > > Logically, you are inconsistant. > > As an example, RO is a should, protecting RO is a MUST.
=> Huh? Protecting it is a must for those who support it! But supporting it is a should. Hesham > > This set of mail exchanges have actually made me think > that this is important functionally and that implementing HAO is > important for security reasons and it is not unreasonable to > insist all nodes implement it. > > John > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
