Margaret Wasserman wrote: > ... > I've had an action item for a while to summarize the thread > that led to this conclusion to the IPv6 list, but I haven't > gotten to it yet. I'll do so soon.
I appreciate that work loads make a summary effort challenging, but in this particular case it would seem the lower effort path would be to cut off the IPv6 thread by forwarding the analysis. Hopefully it will make it clear to all that the scope of SL can't exceed the scope of the IGP, and shouldn't exceed the configured sub-scopes of that IGP without explicit configuration. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
