Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Current text:
Hi Brian,
> Site-local addresses are designed to be used for addressing
inside of
> a site without the need for a global prefix. Although a subnet ID
> may be up to 54-bits long, it is expected that globally-connected
> sites will use the same subnet IDs for site-local and global
> prefixes.
Proposed new text:
Site-local addresses are designed to be used for addressing inside of
a site which is not connected to the Internet and therefore does not
need a global prefix. They must not be used for a site that is
connected
to the Internet. Using site-local addresses, a subnet ID may be up to
54-bits long, but it is recommended to use at most 16-bit subnet IDs,
for convenience if the site is later connected to the Internet using a
global prefix.
I would support this change. However, I doubt that we will get
consensus to make this change before the addressing architecture
is issued as an RFC. I guess we'll see how things develop in
Atlanta.
Alternatively, we could spend the next 5 years discussing the
unnecessary complexities of using site-locals on connected sites.
This is _exactly_ what I am hoping to avoid.
Let's limit site-locals to the well-understood case, and focus on
solving the real problems:
- Getting IPv6 finalized and ready for wide-scale deployment
- Multi-homing
- Renumbering
- Security model for shared IPv4/IPv6 networks
I agree with Brian and Margaret.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
