> Looking at this from your perspective: > - I think GUPI, possibly routable, global-scope addresses might be ok, I > have lots and lots of reservations about them, but they're not for this > working group to try to cope with. > - If we just stick to modifying site-locals somehow (and leave the PI > global scopes out of the problem statement), I would definitely push for > "nearly unique" site-locals
I think this WG needs to define GUPIs - because that seems like the best way to take the pressure off of SLs to be misused. however I don't think we should try to make them globally routable, at least not now. once we do that, I don't know that nearly unique SLs is such a big deal, but I wouldn't object to them. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
