Mika Liljeberg wrote: > You're right. However, I think it's just common sense that a > host, which sets up a 6to4 pseudo interface by default, > should also automatically disable it if a router is sending > RAs with 2002:xyz:: prefixes. Otherwise the host > implementation is broken.
Not necessarily. As long as the RA based prefix has a lower metric than the local pseudo interface, there is no reason to disable it. Depending on the implementation, this might allow for a faster recovery when the RA disappears. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
