Hi Tony, Fred,

In principle, I like the document, but I will much prefer that "private addresses" is 
not used, or at least is more clarified. I
just try to avoid the relation of this "limited range" to the possibility of a 
NAT-like mechanism ...

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <IETF-Announce:>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:14 PM
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt


> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>
>
> Title : Limited Range Addressing Requirements
> Author(s) : T. Hain, F. Templin
> Filename : draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt
> Pages : 18
> Date : 2003-8-4
>
> The IPv6 addressing architecture specifies global and local-use
> unicast addressing schemes, but provides no operational guidelines or
> requirements for their use. There is a strong requirement for
> addressing that is limited to a bounded domain of applicability, or
> range. This memo will discuss requirements for limited range
> addressing.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt
>

*****************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on-line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to