Hi Tony, Fred, In principle, I like the document, but I will much prefer that "private addresses" is not used, or at least is more clarified. I just try to avoid the relation of this "limited range" to the possibility of a NAT-like mechanism ...
Regards, Jordi ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <IETF-Announce:> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:14 PM Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > > > Title : Limited Range Addressing Requirements > Author(s) : T. Hain, F. Templin > Filename : draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2003-8-4 > > The IPv6 addressing architecture specifies global and local-use > unicast addressing schemes, but provides no operational guidelines or > requirements for their use. There is a strong requirement for > addressing that is limited to a bounded domain of applicability, or > range. This memo will discuss requirements for limited range > addressing. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt > ***************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on-line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------