ipng  

Messages by Date

• 2003/08/11 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/11 RE: apps people? Christian Huitema
• 2003/08/10 RE: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing)] Brian Zill
• 2003/08/10 Re: apps people? Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/10 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Tim Chown
• 2003/08/10 RE: apps people? Michel Py
• 2003/08/10 Re: local vs. nonlocal address stability ( was Re: apps people? ) Keith Moore
• 2003/08/10 RE: apps people? Michel Py
• 2003/08/10 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bound, Jim
• 2003/08/10 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Mika Liljeberg
• 2003/08/10 Re: local vs. nonlocal address stability ( was Re: apps people? ) Keith Moore
• 2003/08/10 Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue" Thomas Narten
• 2003/08/10 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Hans Kruse
• 2003/08/10 Re: global-local draft and FD00/8 space Aidan Williams
• 2003/08/10 RE: local vs. nonlocal address stability ( was Re: apps people? ) Tony Hain
• 2003/08/10 Re: global-local draft and FD00/8 space Mark Smith
• 2003/08/10 Re: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Tim Chown
• 2003/08/10 Re: apps people? Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/10 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/10 Re: local vs. nonlocal address stability ( was Re: apps people? ) Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/10 RE: A suggestion around address selection behaviour Tony Hain
• 2003/08/10 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Geoff Huston
• 2003/08/10 RE: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/09 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Dan Lanciani
• 2003/08/09 What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/09 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bound, Jim
• 2003/08/09 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Hans Kruse
• 2003/08/09 RE: RFC 2928 Tony Hain
• 2003/08/09 RE: apps people? Tony Hain
• 2003/08/09 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bound, Jim
• 2003/08/09 Re: apps people? Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/09 Re: apps people? Tim Chown
• 2003/08/09 RE: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing)] Tony Hain
• 2003/08/09 RE: apps people? Michel Py
• 2003/08/09 RE: local vs. nonlocal address stability ( was Re: apps people? ) Bound, Jim
• 2003/08/09 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bound, Jim
• 2003/08/09 RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Tony Hain
• 2003/08/09 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Andrew White
• 2003/08/09 Re: global-local draft and FD00/8 space Aidan Williams
• 2003/08/09 Re: apps people? Keith Moore
• 2003/08/09 RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Pekka Savola
• 2003/08/09 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing fredrik
• 2003/08/08 Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? Michael Mielke
• 2003/08/08 Re: apps people? Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/08 Re: local addresses, 6to4 and 2002:RFC1918 [Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing] Keith Moore
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? Tony Hain
• 2003/08/08 Re: Moving backward [Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward....]] Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/08 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Chirayu Patel
• 2003/08/08 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Patrik Fältström
• 2003/08/08 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Tim Chown
• 2003/08/08 RE: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing)] Michel Py
• 2003/08/08 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Keith Moore
• 2003/08/08 Re: global-local draft and FD00/8 space Mark Smith
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? Michel Py
• 2003/08/08 RE: Let's abolish scope [Re: Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing)] Tony Hain
• 2003/08/08 Re: Multi-homing (was RE: Moving backward [Re: Fourth alternative [wasRe: Moving forward ....]]) Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? Tony Hain
• 2003/08/08 Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Patrik Fältström
• 2003/08/08 RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-01.txt Peter Barany
• 2003/08/08 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Keith Moore
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/08 RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-01.txt Peter Barany
• 2003/08/08 RE: apps people? fredrik
• 2003/08/08 Re: apps people? Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/08 Re: apps people? Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/08 IPv6 WG management update Thomas Narten
• 2003/08/08 Re: Let's abolish scope Mark Smith
• 2003/08/07 RE: apps people? fredrik
• 2003/08/07 Re: apps people? Patrik Fältström
• 2003/08/07 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Margaret Wasserman
• 2003/08/07 RE: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Pekka Savola
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Andrew White
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Aidan Williams
• 2003/08/07 apps people? Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/07 Re: apps people? Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/07 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Dean Strik
• 2003/08/07 RE: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Tony Hain
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Mark Smith
• 2003/08/07 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-01.txt Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/07 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing matthew . ford
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Pekka Savola
• 2003/08/07 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Keith Moore
• 2003/08/07 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Geoff Huston
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Pekka Savola
• 2003/08/07 Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Andrew White
• 2003/08/07 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Aidan Williams
• 2003/08/07 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Pekka Savola
• 2003/08/06 Re: Independence of Deprecation (Was: Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing) Keith Moore
• 2003/08/06 RE: A suggestion around address selection behaviour fredrik
• 2003/08/06 Re: Real life scenario - requirements (local addressing) Andrew White
• 2003/08/06 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Aidan Williams
• 2003/08/06 RE: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Fred.Templin
• 2003/08/06 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Geoff Huston
• 2003/08/06 RE: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Tony Hain
• 2003/08/06 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Naiming Shen
• 2003/08/06 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/06 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Christian Huitema
• 2003/08/06 RE: apps people? Tony Hain
• 2003/08/06 Independence of Deprecation (Was: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing) Margaret Wasserman
• 2003/08/06 Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue" Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/06 Re: A suggestion around address selection behaviour Keith Moore
• 2003/08/06 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Lars Erik Gullerud
• 2003/08/06 Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing) Nir Arad
• 2003/08/06 Re: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local andLocal Addressing Michael Mielke
• 2003/08/06 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Tom Petch
• 2003/08/06 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Ralph Droms
• 2003/08/06 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/06 What will happen to ::RFC1918? EricLKlein
• 2003/08/06 Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue" Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/06 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/06 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/06 RE: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Michel Py
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• 2003/08/05 RE: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Chirayu Patel
• 2003/08/05 Re: local addresses, 6to4 and 2002:RFC1918 [Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing] Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/05 Re: state-of-art SLs Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 RE: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/05 Re: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local andLocal Addressing Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Todd T. Fries
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 Re: state-of-art SLs Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Hans Kruse
• 2003/08/05 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Keith Moore
• 2003/08/05 Re: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local andLocal Addressing Fred Templin
• 2003/08/05 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/05 Re: Site-Local and Local Addressing -- "Replacement" Choices Hans Kruse
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Zefram
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Yibo Zhang
• 2003/08/05 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/05 Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/05 Re: Fourth alternative [was Re: Moving forward ....] Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/05 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Leif Johansson
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Patrik Fältström
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Alain Durand
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Fred Templin
• 2003/08/04 Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Jeroen Massar
• 2003/08/04 RE: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Tony Hain
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Tony Hain
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/04 draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Eliot Lear
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Todd T. Fries
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Dan Lanciani
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michael Thomas
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Alain Durand
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Dan Lanciani
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Ralph Droms
• 2003/08/04 RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Tony Hain
• 2003/08/04 RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Tony Hain
• 2003/08/04 Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• 2003/08/04 Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/04 RE: site-local observations from the outside Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/04 Re: site-local observations from the outside JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• 2003/08/04 site-local observations from the outside Todd T. Fries
• 2003/08/04 Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• 2003/08/04 RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Michel Py
• 2003/08/04 Re: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/04 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/08/04 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Robert Elz
• 2003/08/03 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Margaret Wasserman
• 2003/08/02 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Scott Bradner
• 2003/08/01 Re: comments on address selection API Sebastien Roy
• 2003/08/01 RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Michel Py
• 2003/08/01 Draft Minutes from Vienna IETF Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/01 test, please ignore Bob Hinden
• 2003/08/01 RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Tony Hain
• 2003/08/01 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Steven M. Bellovin
• 2003/08/01 RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Michel Py
• 2003/08/01 Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal Robert Elz
• 2003/07/31 Re: comments on address selection API Robert Elz
• 2003/07/31 Re: DiffServ field Brian E Carpenter
• 2003/07/30 Re: comments on address selection API Sebastien Roy
• 2003/07/30 RE: DiffServ field Christian Huitema
• 2003/07/30 Re: Same global address on Multiple Interface of an IP6 node Erik Nordmark
• 2003/07/30 Re: IPv6 -> MAC multicast address mapping Nir Arad
• 2003/07/29 Re: DiffServ field Fred Baker
• 2003/07/29 Re: DiffServ field Nenad Laskovic
• 2003/07/29 Re: DiffServ field Nenad Laskovic
• 2003/07/29 Re: DiffServ field in IPv6 Fred Baker
• 2003/07/29 RE: IPv6 -> MAC multicast address mapping Christian Huitema
• 2003/07/29 Re: IPv6 -> MAC multicast address mapping Ignatios Souvatzis
• 2003/07/29 Re: state-of-art SLs Bhaskar S
• 2003/07/29 Re: state-of-art SLs Margaret Wasserman
• 2003/07/29 Re: state-of-art SLs Robert Elz
• 2003/07/29 Re: a concern on bridge-like nd-proxies Thomas Narten
• 2003/07/29 Re: IPv6 -> MAC multicast address mapping Ignatios Souvatzis
• 2003/07/29 Re: state-of-art SLs Brian E Carpenter

• Later messages