On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:52:32PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > > No. That would admit the possibility of reusing that prefix for some > other purpose. What we really need is for all hosts and routers to > filter FEC0://10 packets unless explicitly configured to do otherwise.
Actually while I agree with "A" I still want fec0::/10 available for me to use in a community wireless network, until a better alternative comes along - but of course I would have to "explicitly configure" that anyway. My concern for Bob's draft for a large private network is that I might prefer fec0::/10 than the "complexity" of registering 100+ non aggregated GUSL-style prefixes. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
