s/will prove/might prove.
:-) On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Carlos Friacas wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Tim Chown wrote: > > > Carlos, the question is "where are the cost savings in renumbering an > > IPv6 network as opposed to renumbering an IPv4 network". > > > > Tim > > > > PS. According to dnsop people, everyone will use DHCPv6(!) > > > Use of DHCPv6 will solve the resolver issue, if its inside the renumbering > network... however some predictions will prove to be wrong later... > > About the costs: If the IPv4 network being renumbered already uses dhcp, i > dont see any real cost difference. :-( > > > ./Carlos "Upgrade the Internet! -- Now!" > -------------- [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt] http://www.fccn.pt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup > FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional fax:+351 218472167 > > "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!" > > ./Carlos "Upgrade the Internet! -- Now!" -------------- [http://www.ip6.fccn.pt] http://www.fccn.pt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN, Wide Area Network Workgroup FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional fax:+351 218472167 "Internet is just routes (125953/461), naming (millions) and... people!" -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
