At 12:05 AM +0300 8/11/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote: >This is the beginning of a two-week WG Last Call, which will end August 24. >The target status for this document is Informational (to obsolete RFC 2411). >The current document is at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-03.
That was a week ago. >If you have not read the document before now, please do so. Having fresh >eyes on the document often brings up important issues. This document is very >much a survey, so please also review it for completeness: are there >documents that should be mentioned but aren't. Send any comments to the >list, even if they are as simple as "I read it and it seems fine". And, so far, we have heard nothing. *This is bad.* This is a WG document: that means it needs to have rough consensus of the WG. Silence is not consent. >Please clearly indicate the position of any issue in the Internet Draft, and >if possible provide alternative text. Indicate the nature or severity of the >error or correction, e.g. major technical, minor technical, nit, so that we >can quickly judge the extent of problems with the document. ...and do so within the next week. If we do not get enough input during WG Last Call, we will have to reconsider how to handle this and future documents. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
