At 8:12 PM -0500 11/23/09, Dan McDonald wrote: >On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:37:22PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> This has flummoxed a few reviewers. Tables such as those in section 3.3.2 >> are already out of date because things have been added since RFC 4306. I >> propose that we remove all these tables from IKEv2bis, and add notes >> pointing to the current IANA registries. I cannot see how doing this lookup >> will hurt developers: in fact, it forces them to actually look at the >> up-to-date tables. I can see how we might want to leave the tables in, but >> it really is confusing. > >Can you move 'em to an appendix, with a permanent URL reference to the IANA >up-to-date versions?
As long as you mean "an appendix that clearly says 'these were in RFC 4306 but are now out-of-date but are here just for reference and you want to look at <URL>'", I'm OK with that as well. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
