Dan Harkins writes: > Groups 1 and 2 were defined in RFC 2409 and repeating them in a > subsequent RFC does not change that.
RFC2409 has been obsoleted, so I do not want to refer to that, as people will then go to the RFC2409 and notice that it has been obsoleted by RFC4306, and will go to there and find the groups from RFC4306 appendix B.1 and B.2. The groups are same, so it does not really matter which document is referenced. > I suggest leaving the reference to RFC 2409 for groups 1 and 2 (and > 3 and 4 for that matter) that currently exists today at > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipsec-registry, as of 2315 GMT on 30 > November 2009, aka "right now". I am NOT going to touch ipsec-registry. That is IKEv1 stuff that is already obsoleted, and there is no point of doing anything for that (and no need, as it does nto have range allocations). I am talking about IKEv2 registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters) and there the references were already for RFC4306, not to RFC2409 (and it does not have groups 3 and 4 at all, those are not defined for IKEv2). -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
