I think the tables should list the values needed to implement *this* specification; in all cases except here, that's the same as "defined in RFC 4306", but not in this case.
Best regards, Pasi > -----Original Message----- > From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of ext Yaron Sheffer > Sent: 19 January, 2010 08:58 > To: Paul Hoffman; Tero Kivinen; ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IPsec] Notify types, was: RE: Review of rest of draft-ietf- > ipsecme-ikev2 (section 2.23.1 forward) > > I agree with Tero, regardless of the discussion we had on where to put > the tables etc., the document needs to be internally consistent. So we > should add the new notify types that we're defining in *this* document > to the notify types table. Luckily there aren't many. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section "3.10.1. Notify Message Types" should include: > > > TEMPORARY_FAILURE {TBA1} > See section 2.25. > > CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND {TBA2} > See section 2.25. > > [[ Response: Can't do that: the WG decided we have to leave the tables > with the values defined in RFC 4306. Those two are, of course, listed > in the IANA considerations. ]] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
