At 2:12 PM +0200 1/19/10, Tero Kivinen wrote: >Paul Hoffman writes: >> Following things might or might not need to be added to section 1.7 >> (taken from appendix E): >> >> [[ Response: I included only some of those. 1.7 is not meant to be >> exhaustive: it can't be. But I did add a bunch you had suggested >> that I had missed on my pass. ]] > >Can you send new 1.7 (or at least list which entries you included, and >which you left out) before putting out new version so we can see which >one you included.
Yes. Given the large set of open issues, I'll publish another draft and give folks time to review it before we pass it along for IETF Last call. >Some of those are important some are not, and I included in my list >all that I tough might be important enough to be mentioned (and yes, I >agree not all of them needs to be there, but those were entries I >assumed someone might think needs to be there, so I think it might be >good idea to get comments now, not only after next revision). And others thought that some of the ones listed currently are not important enough to list. I have no idea how we will agree on this. >BTW, you didn't anwer to my question what is the intended relationship >between "Appendix D. Significant Changes from RFC 4306" and " 1.7. >Differences Between RFC 4306 and This Document"? I removed Appendix D. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
