On Mar 24, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
- For the cluster with just one member doing IKE and IPsec, I
propose "hot-standby cluster"
- For the cluster with several members doing IKE and IPsec, I
propose to keep "load-sharing cluster"
Is this fine with everyone?
I'm good with that, as long as we understand that both types of
cluster may be either completely fault tolerant, partially fault
tolerant, or not fault tolerant. Of course, the taxonomy is simpler
with only FT/not-FT, and most implementations will probably strive to
be one or the other.
--Rod
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
