Johannes Merkle writes: > > I think it would be best to take the ECDH processing rules (mostly > > from 5903 but also add the checks if those are needed) and create new > > RFC that will update 5996. This document should not include any > > groups. > > > I assume that my draft should refer to this RFC-to-be, right?
Most certainly, if we can agree to make such RFC, and get it published fast enough. The question is, whether there is enough interest to make such RFC, and who would be willing to work on such document. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
