Our answer:
- I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work on
standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
paul
On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> <chair-hat on>
>
> It is seeming that consensus is trending towards "let's document the
> fragmentation method some vendors are already doing instead of finishing
> IKEv2-over-TCP", but I would like to check that. Please respond to the
> informal poll below.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>
> - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP
>
> - I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work on
> standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
>
> - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP and also work
> on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
