Paul Hoffman writes: > <chair-hat on> > > It is seeming that consensus is trending towards "let's document the > fragmentation method some vendors are already doing instead of > finishing IKEv2-over-TCP", but I would like to check that. Please > respond to the informal poll below. > > --Paul Hoffman > > - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP > - I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and > instead work on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation > - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP and > also work on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
Either 1 or 2, but not for 3. I.e. either one is fine for me, but I do not want to have two ways of doing it in IKEv2. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
