Dear IPsecME folks,
There is clear working group interest in a standard auto-discovery VPN
solution. We have agreed-upon requirements [1]. And we have 3 serious
contenders [2] [3] [4] for the solution. It is time to select a protocol
to adopt into the working group.
We would like to ask people who are *not* authors on any of the solution
drafts to send a short message to the list, saying which of the three
they prefer, and a few reasons for their choice.
Please do *not* send mail saying which of the protocols you do *not*
like - this would be far less useful. And please do not think up a new
solution proposal, it's too late for that.
A quick process reminder: once we adopt a protocol, it becomes the
starting point for the working group document. The WG can change the
editor team and is free to make material changes to the protocol before
it is published as RFC.
Thanks,
Paul and Yaron
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7018
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mao-ipsecme-ad-vpn-protocol-02
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-03
[4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-dmvpn-00
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
