Hi Yaron, Is this an official poll or is it "just to see" ? If this is serious, what is the deadline ?
thanks, fred On 03 Dec 2013, at 18:40, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear IPsecME folks, > > There is clear working group interest in a standard auto-discovery VPN > solution. We have agreed-upon requirements [1]. And we have 3 serious > contenders [2] [3] [4] for the solution. It is time to select a protocol to > adopt into the working group. > > We would like to ask people who are *not* authors on any of the solution > drafts to send a short message to the list, saying which of the three they > prefer, and a few reasons for their choice. > > Please do *not* send mail saying which of the protocols you do *not* like - > this would be far less useful. And please do not think up a new solution > proposal, it's too late for that. > > A quick process reminder: once we adopt a protocol, it becomes the starting > point for the working group document. The WG can change the editor team and > is free to make material changes to the protocol before it is published as > RFC. > > Thanks, > Paul and Yaron > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7018 > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mao-ipsecme-ad-vpn-protocol-02 > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-03 > [4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-dmvpn-00 > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec