(thread broken intentionally)
Frederic Detienne (fdetienn) <fdeti...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> - No overlay of additional routing protocols is needed.
> please note that our proposal does not mandate a routing protocol. We
> also support IKEv2 config exchange and treat the protected subnets as
> "routes" for the tunnel.
I have no idea how to implement what you described.
This is the problem: we have asked questions, and we keep getting "oh, yes,
we can do that", but no actual explanation.
I'd rather that you had mandated OSPFv2/3 or someso that I could evaluate the
entire solution.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
pgpBLSt4jIhy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
