Hi Paul/Community, Discussion on a draft a good thing for whole community and it benefit the design rationale for future reference. So, discussion on a draft can still go on "in a separate thread" . While people are doing selection on another thread.
Most of time, discussion get started with open ended question, revising the draft may not be equally beneficial. Kind Regards, Raj -----Original Message----- From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 6:35 AM To: Frederic Detienne (fdetienn) Cc: <ipsec@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [IPsec] routing protocols for ADVPN <hat on> On Dec 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Frederic Detienne (fdetienn) <fdeti...@cisco.com> wrote: > Now if it helps clarifying our position: Stop this, please. It is rude to hijack a thread that is specifically for non-authors. If you want to clarify a position, simply update the draft. To everyone else who is not an author of a draft: please see the first message in the thread <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg08861.html> and consider voicing your opinion, hopefully without debate from document authors. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
