> On Mar 6, 2015, at 6:01 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: >> Greetings again. A few people have expressed interest in having >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305 as a WG item >> for IPsecME. If you want this as a WG document, and you are willing to >> review drafts as they move through, please say so on this thread. If you are >> opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). Thanks in >> advance. > > This got very little interest, which surprised me. Without a few more people > who will commit to review the document and offer comments, we can't really > call it a WG work item. Is there really so little interest in new algorithms > that are being adopted in other protocols? > > If you are an IPsec implementer, it would be very useful to know whether or > not you would support adding this algorithm to your implementation, and why. >
Obviously I’m in favor of adoption, as I’m the author. [vendor hat on] If (when?) this becomes an RFC, Check Point will implement this, in all likelihood this year or early next year. I of course can’t promise dates or versions when this is delivered as a feature in our product - that is more of a UI decision, and out of my hands. Yoav _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
