On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Tero Kivinen wrote:
The problem is that to be really usuful we would need to include similar text we already have in RFC8247 for example, i.e., explain where ENCR_AES_CCM_8 is useful and why it is SHOULD for some environments, but not SHOULD for others etc.
I explained before that only MUST NOT entries would be marked in the registry along with SHOULD NOT entries qualifying for deprecation due to disuse (eg CAST). Anything with a "qualifier" would not be marked in the registry as obsolete/deprecated. Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
