Benjamin Kaduk writes: > Sorry! I think that the current charter allows us to do an 8229bis > without additional rechartering.
Good. I myself think it is better to do bis documents than just clarification guidelines as splitting things to multiple documents do make things harder to implement. Also I think that currently everything in the draft is really a clarification to the original document, i.e. something that the original document should have already said more clearly, and in some cases there are new rules to be added to the processing of the packets. There are no real implementation guidelines in the current draft, i.e., something that would say something like "when doing xxx, it is often good idea to do yyy also", or "to implement zzz, algorithm like aaa is good, but others can also be used". I.e., cases where there are multiple ways of doing same thing, and any of them can be used, but some of them has been found to be better than others. Because of this I think it would be quite natural to start making the bis document instead of clarification document if authors are willing to work on such draft too... -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
