Hi, During the last IETF meeting it was agreed that we would move quickly to resolve any issues that Tero had left, and get this document submitted to the IESG. So asking again if the new version (published prior to the meeting) satisfied the issues so we can move forward?
Thanks, Chris. > On Jul 5, 2021, at 3:48 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes: > >> Hi Tero, >> >> I understand you have some additional post-WGLC technical comments on the >> draft. I'm sending this message to start a discussion thread so that the >> issue can be resolved and we can move forward on the publication request. > > I have published a new version clarifying that one does *not* need to set the > reorder and replay windows to the smaller of the two values, and in the case > of slow tunnels it very well may make sense to have a larger replay window > for logging purposes and a small or zero reorder window. > > As this document achieved WGLC consensus over 3 months ago, I would request > that the process please continue forward. > > Thanks, > Chris. > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
