Hi Warren,
Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> writes:On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 5:33 AM, Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org> wrote: This CBR ESP tunnel is basically identical to a CBR pseudowire. There was quite a bit of work/discussion between PWE3 and various transport groups in the past that resulted in a set of guidance on how such pseudowires are safe to deploy. This guidance needs to be adopted here as well (or we'll need a much longer discussion on what alternative guidance could look like and why.) I'll happily admit that I haven't read that / those discussions, but I'm glad that it sounds like there is existing work that can be cribbed from…
Indeed, and we have in fact added a reference to RFC7893 to the document in response to resolving this DISCUSS. :) Thanks, Chris. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
