On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 5:46 PM Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > I started this last call almost a month ago, and I have not seen any > discussion, comments or emails on the ipsec list. > > For me that would indicate that nobody has actually reviewed the > document during the WGLC, and would indicate there is very little > interest in publishing this document. > > I will keep the document in WGLC state for some time, but perhaps we > should think whether there is enough interest to work on this issue at > all. >
Sorry I thought / meant to reply. I think the concept is good, but I have questions on "supported" vs "accepted". Often in these cases the support for all thee auth methods are there, it is just that for some connections we require one auth type and for another connection another auth type. I am not sure sending indications in IKE_SA_INIT helps most cases, but it will help some if we remember the ones we received when it is time to generate the AUTH payload. adopting and talking about it more would be good. Paul
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
