Hi Michael,

> I am those that didn't read it during WGLC, or pay attention it before, but I 
> scanned it.
> It seems to solve a problem that I don't think that I have.
> 
> I do not object to publishing it.
> 
> Given that Notify messages are available without a draft,  it might be that
> what we have (an ID) is presently enough.
> (i.e. allocate it a Notify value, and just let it wait for some more people
> to implement it.)

the draft is also used in (now expired) draft-guthrie-ipsecme-ikev2-hybrid-auth.

Regards,
Valery.

> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to