Hi I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08. Thanks for this document. Below is my feedback:
** Section 3.1 Section 3.1.5 of [I-D.ietf-add-dnr] lists a set of service parameters that are recommended to be supported by implementations. The referenced section in draft-ietf-add-dnr provides MTI and RECOMMENDED options. Are both of these applicable here? ** Section 3.2. Is the RESERVED field 2 or 3 octets? Figure 2 and 3 says two and the text says three. ** Section 3.2. Per the Certificate Digest field, please provide a normative reference to computing a SPKI hash. ** Section 3.2. Typo. s/theENCDNS_DIGEST_INFO/the ENCDNS_DIGEST_INFO/ ** Section 4 If the request includes multiple bitwise identical attributes, only the first occurrence is processed, and the rest SHOULD be ignored by the responder. If only the first attribute should be processed why is the second clause not a MUST. What would be the expected extraordinary behavior given this SHOULD? ** Section 4. These instances SHOULD be processed by initiators following their service priority (i.e., smaller service priority values indicates a higher preference). Can the intent of "processed" be clarified here? There are times when the service priority should be ignored? Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec