Hi

I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08. Thanks for this 
document. Below is my feedback:

** Section 3.1

Section 3.1.5 of
[I-D.ietf-add-dnr] lists a set of service parameters that are
recommended to be supported by implementations.

The referenced section in draft-ietf-add-dnr provides MTI and RECOMMENDED 
options. Are both of these applicable here?

** Section 3.2. Is the RESERVED field 2 or 3 octets? Figure 2 and 3 says two 
and the text says three.

** Section 3.2. Per the Certificate Digest field, please provide a normative 
reference to computing a SPKI hash.

** Section 3.2. Typo. s/theENCDNS_DIGEST_INFO/the ENCDNS_DIGEST_INFO/

** Section 4
If the request includes multiple bitwise identical attributes,
only the first occurrence is processed, and the rest SHOULD be
ignored by the responder. 

If only the first attribute should be processed why is the second clause not a 
MUST. What would be the expected extraordinary behavior given this SHOULD?

** Section 4.
These
instances SHOULD be processed by initiators following their
service priority (i.e., smaller service priority values indicates
a higher preference).

Can the intent of "processed" be clarified here? There are times when the 
service priority should be ignored?

Regards,
Roman

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to