Scott Fluhrer \(sfluhrer\) writes: > My comment "this shouldn't block draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem was aimed at > the working group, and not to the draft authors. > > That said, to the working group, what is blocking > draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem? The draft is needed, quite straight-forward, > and there are interoperable implementations out there. What's stopping us?
It is waiting for the draft authors to say it is ready, and that they want to have working group last call for it. As a chair I do not go through documents and try to push them forward, I do assume that draft authors have enough interest to push documents forward, and send emails to [email protected], if they think document is ready for some WG action (adoption, WG LC etc). -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
