Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, it doesn't. The attack would be just as applicable if we > offered group 19 (preferred) and group 1 (supported), and the attacker > had a factor base to group 1.
Sure, but:
Perhaps there are algorithms which can be broken in real time without a
CRQC,
but if so, they were broken awhile ago, and aren't in use.
So, if you accept group 1, then you were already broken, period.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
