It is not just the implementation including support for PPK or not. It’s the 
deployment considerations, the domain admin’s ability and willingness to manage 
PPKs. 
—
Regards,
Uri

Secure Resilient Systems and Technologies
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

> On Jul 31, 2025, at 08:26, Jun Hu (Nokia) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside the Laboratory.
> By “mandating use of PPK” I meant in RFC8784 PPK is already a negotiated 
> option, but in order to prevent attacker remove the USE_PPK notification, 
> both sides need to have policy to mandate PPK must be used.
> Of course, we can’t assume all implementations support PPK, but it is same we 
> can’t assume all implementations will support new protocol changes this draft 
> introduces specifically the changes in the draft is not trivial; at least 
> RFC8784 has been out for a while, and I know quite some ipsec implementations 
> already supported it.
> I think if the WG adopt this draft, there should be texts in the draft 
> mentioning all these mitigations beside protocol changes.
>  
> From: Christopher Patton <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 6:08 AM
> To: Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jun Hu (Nokia) <[email protected]>; Michael Richardson 
> <[email protected]>; Valery Smyslov <[email protected]>; Scott 
> Fluhrer <[email protected]>; ipsec <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [IPsec] Re: 
> draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention
>  
>  
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> information.
>  
> 
> Hi Uri and Jun,
>  
> I agree - mandating use of PPK may not work. However, suggesting use of PPK, 
> i.e., as a (negotiable?) option would be a very good thing: those who have 
> the ability to employ it, and want better security - would opt in. While 
> those who don’t care or for various reasons cannot manage the distribution - 
> could opt out. 
>  
> This sounds like a good idea to me! 
> https://github.com/smyslov/ikev2-downgrade-prevention/issues/5
>  
> Chris P.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to