Thanks for the comments. Please see my replies in lines (starting with GL).
Guilin 发件人：Marc Penninga <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 收件人：[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 时 间：2026-01-26 03:57:15 主 题：[IPsec] Re: Call for adoption: draft-wang-ipsecme-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo-03 (Ends 2026-02-09) I support adoption of this document. Given that many European governments recommend FrodoKEM, adding it to IKE is a good thing. Two remarks on the text: - I think the draft should be agnostic as to how implementations use FrodoKEM. GL: Ok, thanks. - The FrodoKEM specification has also been published as an I-D (draft-longa-cfrg-frodokem-01). Wouldn't it make more sense to use that as a refererence, rather than the ISO proposal? (BTW, the reference in draft-wang-ipsecme-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo-03 is outdated; the latest version of the ISO proposal is https://frodokem.org/files/FrodoKEM_standard_proposal_20250929.pdf). GL: You are right. We should update the link with the 20250929 version. I must forgot to do it. We are also ok to use the draft in CFRG as the normative reference. Best, Marc Penninga _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
