hmm, this is the ip of our ServiceApp6 SVI interface, which C told us has only local significance, apparently this is not the case. Time to renumber then.
Cheers Jan Am 29.05.2013 um 21:59 schrieb Jeroen Massar <[email protected]>: > ... > 4 2001:7f8:1::a500:3303:1 (2001:7f8:1::a500:3303:1) 20.755 ms 20.763 ms > 20.784 ms > 5 fd00:3303::1 (fd00:3303::1) 22.010 ms 21.984 ms 21.986 ms > 6 2a02:120c:1051:d010::1 (2a02:120c:1051:d010::1) 17.806 ms 17.889 ms > 17.842 ms > 7 2a02:120c:1051:d010::1 (2a02:120c:1051:d010::1) 18.720 ms 18.593 ms > 18.617 ms > ... > > Hmmmm fd00::/8, that really should never ever be visible on the Internet, > being Unique *LOCAL* Addresses. > And it does not look like they applied the randomness bit for picking a > prefix either. > You would also almost think that a /28 is more than enough address space to > put a few router loopbacks in. > > It is apparently time for people to start checking their filters again > because it seems that these packets leak into other ASNs too... > > More generally, do recheck your network for BCP38 compliance, please do apply > it and require your peers to do the same! > > Greets, > Jeroen
