On 14.02.15, 19.39, "Erik Kline" <e...@google.com> wrote:
>> From our perspective, doing investments on CGN/AFTR technology now can >>almost be comparable with buying address, as we must consider >>deprecation on the equipment anyways. If we can wait a bit longer and >>the IPv4 traffic lowers to for example 10% and then do the CGN /AFTER >>investment, it would possibly be cheaper and possibly be done with >>equipment we already have. I guess seen from a pure economics >>perspective it does not make much difference, but at least we can uphold >>the native IPv4 until the majority of ISP's and content providers are >>fully Dual-Stacked. > >What does "IPv4 traffic lowers to...10%" mean here? > >Is this 10% meant to suggest that you'll wait until 90% of the >Internet has IPv6, or when the average dualstack user's traffic mix >will reach 90% IPv6 to 10% IPv4? The latter, apologies for being unclear... :)
