>> The difference is that FOSDEM promotes the NAT64 SSID as the main one and >> the dual stack SSID as the fallback. > >Yes. Which is exactly what we ask for . Just switch the default >and see what happens. > >https://blogs.cisco.com/developer/fosdem-2019-a-new-view-from-the-noc
Maybe there is another question this working group can answer: Does this working group recommend wifi deployments as NAT64? (of course only NAT64, not paired with dual stack on another SSID) - Is it recommended for a coffee shop or restaurant - Is it recommended for an office lan, - for a home situation - for just a random conference? The cisco report on FOSDEM 2019 has an interesting statistic: "There were more clients on the IPv6 native network then on the IPv4 network, "with on Sunday afternoon ~3330 IPv4 DHCP clients against ~4300 reachable "IPv6-only clients and ~1300 IPv6 clients on the dual stack network. That suggests that 3330 'clients' picked the non-default dual stack network compared to 4300 'clients' that used the default SSID.
