> On 20220224, at 16:26, Gert Doering <g...@space.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 04:08:45PM +0100, Jeroen Massar via ipv6-wg wrote:
>>> People could ask "why not GUA"? The answer is: it is difficult to get yet
>>> another /28 GUA from RIR just for the infrastructure.
>>> /28 goal has the technical roots by itself. It is the sort of technical
>>> solution.
>>
>> RIR typically give out the space that one really needs.
>>
>> If you can justify it, you will get it.
>>
>> If you cannot justify it, you likely do not need it.
>>
>> As a LIR can get a IPv6 /29 per default (and then likely never have to ask
>> again).... I would be very surprised if one is a large entity that one
>> cannot receive an extra /28.
>
> If I hear "/28 just for the infrastructure" I'd claim "they are doing
> something wrong, in significant ways".
>
> No network is so big that a /32 wouldn't be enough *for the infrastructure*
> (4 billion /64 subnets), unless you start encoding stuff into network
> prefixes that should not be there.
>
> And no, people should not get /28s for (pure) "network numbers are hard"
> reasons.
Full ack on that.
Hence why I mentioned "if you can justify it" :)
Greets,
Jeroen
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
