Thanks for your input Michael. The vagueness of the problem description
reflects my own confusion.
We are not using IGP as of now, its a small NOC with a couple of devices.
------- Original Message -------
On Monday, July 31st, 2023 at 12:38 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Each router needs a /128 as a loopback address to use.
> I assign them all from a single /64 for that purpose.
Ok.
> Many of your p2p ethernet links between sites/routers might not
> need prefixes at all.
This is not clear.
> > 2. How will we be assigning static address to (DNS?)
> > servers?
>
>
> I don't understand the question.
My question was that I have a /35 (say 2001:db8:2000::/35), and a router with
three interfaces, one a p2p link with upstream, rest two interfaces are
connected to two different segments as shown below:
│
┌─────────┴───────┐
│ │
│ Router │
│ │
└────┬───────┬────┘
A │ │ B
┌─────────┘ └───────────┐
│ │
┌─────────┴───┐ ┌───────┴──────┐
│ C D │ E │ F│
┌───┴────┐ ┌──────┴──┐ ┌──┴─┐ ┌──┴─┐
│ dns1 │ │ mail1 │ │ S1│ │S2 │
└────────┘ └─────────┘ └────┘ └────┘
In the diagram above what will be the ip address at points A to F? C-F are
servers and need static ip address.
> Otherwise a static allocation
> from the /64 that the routers provide.
Can you please elaborate this?
Thanks for your patience and time. I hope the questions I am having will be
shared by many and will be addressed in the guidelines when published!
X.
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
