-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> 2 Adverse effects of site local addresses >>> >>> ==> I showed this draft to a believer of site-local addressing, who >>> had had >>> very little experience with IPv6. He was not convinced of the >>> arguments. >>> This may be for one of the many reasons. One fix is to also refer >>> to some >>> documents which include more verbiage than this document, e.g. >>> Margaret >>> Wasserman's SL impact document -- note that such would necessarily >>> have to >>> be a normative reference then, requiring the publication of it as an >>> Informational doc. >> >> People who don't understand the down side of RFC 1918 are hard to >> convince >> by more verbiage, in my experience. So I don't think this would be a >> good use of our collective effort. > > True, but if we wish to remain relevant, something has to be written > somewhere. I fully agree that doing so in *this* document may not be > worth it; it might be worth it in some other doc, e.g. sl-impact.
I agree with Pekka. HAving this in writing somewhere is important. Best regards, - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBP2/u2KarNKXTPFCVEQL+PACg5HhPDOK6MMEMG433odlKWl43NpUAnjBN zKZ+AS//5H++SrR2uv4H+8KA =hvTJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
