Re: Path MTU for Tunnels (was: RE: NOTE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt)

[Fred Templin]

Hmm - I may have spoken too soon, as it looks like RFC 2675 has

some minimum packet sizing requirements that make it just a bit

too big to use over IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels. Maybe we should (bis) it?

 

Fred

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fred Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

P.S. The document can be trivially extended to support IPv6

    Jumbograms - this will be added in the next version